I don't think we get much benefit from this, and the assumption that functions with a return value are pure is sketchy.
In any case, it's better to avoid these repeated calls anyway.
Weak comparisons were used in cases when we were worried about comparing int and float.
In some cases (particularly involving Vector3) we do need to be wary of this, so floatval() is used to avoid incorrect type comparisons.
In other cases, we were already exclusively comparing float-float, so weak compare wasn't needed anyway.
Support for more advanced stuff like NBT copying wasn't added in this PR, as the NBT used by PM is currently an inconsistent mess and doesn't play nice with vanilla. In the interests of avoiding this mess propagating, it's been left for another time.
Adds PlayerEntityPickEvent a la PlayerBlockPickEvent
and Entity->getPickedItem().
players were switching from a weaker tool to a stronger one to get double knockback in PvP.
while it's intended that we don't cancel the second attack during hit cooldown if the damage is
higher (the first damage is subtracted to prevent doubling up), we don't want them to get double
knockback.
this behaviour now matches vanilla to the best of my observations.
Come at me PvP community... I know some people are going to hate this change
this ensures the greatest amount of consistency with vanilla.
in order to prevent the sounds being broadcasted on armor damage with the old method, we'd also have to sacrifice the sound when replacing one leather helmet with another, for example.
this approach minimizes the gameplay impact at the possible expense of plugins.
closes#6325
closes#6104
This function has been a footgun for anyone using it, since it also returns entity AABBs by default.
In all core use cases, this functionality was disabled, and we were paying a needless (admittedly micro) performance penalty for passing the extra useless argument and useless condition check.
This was static to permit ItemFactory to register spawn eggs for all known entity types in early PM4. However, nowadays we provide a callback to the spawn egg instead, and spawn eggs must be manually implemented, so this is no longer needed.
In addition, having this static forces everyone to make a new entity class for every unique type of entity, which isn't ideal.
'enchant' just didn't feel right, being a verb.
All these things pertain to the act of enchanting.
This is now also consistent with CraftingTransaction etc. The ship already sailed on EnchantInventory, which will have to be renamed at a later datte. However, that was already inconsistent with 'enchanting table', so that's the odd one out here.
Perhaps this and EnchantOption should be called EnchantingHelper and EnchantingOption respectively. The terminology used is rather inconsistent, but 'enchantment' definitely isn't the right word here.