this eliminates the performance issues described by #5719.
closes#5719
we may want to consider exposing a public API for this in the future, since it might be useful for plugins.
we can safely assume that:
- the inventory's max stack size won't change during the operation
- two items which stack together have the same max stack size
- the item's max stack size won't change during the operation
Since light population is required to make a chunk tickable, a chunk may not be tickable for some time if the async workers get backlogged.
The previous version of this system only cached the eligibility result if the result was a "yes", but we can also track it when it's a "no", rather than rechecking it every tick.
This change should improve performance in factions and similar gamemodes, which involve large maps with sparsely distributed players, where each player likely has an independent, non-overlapping ticking chunk circle.
We also ditch TickingChunkEntry in favour of multiple arrays to track the eligibility states. This allows us to avoid rechecking the (even cached) readiness of potentially thousands of chunks. If there are no ticking chunks to recheck, this reduces the cost of the selection process to zero.
this doesn't support editing the rear side of a sign, since the 1.12 format doesn't allow us to represent the rear text, and it would necessitate API breaks to support anyway.
However, we can quite trivially support APIs for the sign GUI, which plugins can use to enable editing signs. PocketMine-MP doesn't currently permit this, since it's currently an experimental feature in 1.20, but plugins can simply use Player->openSignEditor() to mimic it.
This is, however, a byproduct of the fact that APIs needed to be added in order to facilitate the use of OpenSignPacket in 1.19.80.
this uses the same dodgy hack used by CraftingTransaction, which assumes that getResultsFor() does not care about the crafting inputs.
While this is currently OK, since none of the currently-implemented recipes care about inputs anyway, it will become a problem when we implement shulker box recipes, so this needs to be addressed.
However, it can't be addressed without BC breaks, so this will have to be dealt with in PM5.
closes#5715
this is usually because of an uncaught exception interacting with a try...finally block.
This will normally result in a crash anyway, and we don't want to obscure the real error.
While event handlers should not throw exceptions, we need to make sure the timings get stopped in the correct order, because the parent Event timer will be stopped due to using a finally block.
If this happens while the handler timing is still running, a second exception will occur, obscuring the real error.
on multi version servers, the same packet may have different IDs, or different packets might use the same ID. In these cases, we don't want the timings to get split up or erroneously reused.
