the theoretical limit for transactions in this case is 64x9 (inputs) + 64x9 (output on crafting grid) + 64 (outputs to main slot) + 64 CraftingEventPackets = 1280.
This is an extreme case which assumes that a recipe could generate up to 64x10 (640) output items per iteration, filling every slot of the output grid, which should never occur in any reasonable circumstances.
getName() essentially serves as an ID for the command for CommandExecutors. It has no other sane use case.
Since it's not unique (multiple commands with the same name may be registered, and the fallback alias will be used on conflict), it cannot be used for array indexing. It's also not correct to use it for any display purpose, since the command may not be able to be invoked by its 'name' if there was a conflict.
There is an open debate about what to do with getName() and the wider CommandExecutor ecosystem, but that's a topic for another discussion.
closes#5344
this could be observed by pressing E and immediately clicking a chest, which, if timed correctly, would lead to the chest lid closing, but the inventory being opened anyway.
we don't need to check this on a bit by bit level if the integers are the same.
this saves 2-3 microseconds per packet on my machine, which doesn't sound like much, but it adds up when there are lots of players.
closes#5154
this hack sends only the bare essential data to create the tiles in LevelChunkPacket,
and then separately sending the full tile data using BlockActorDataPacket afterwards.
This is necessary because the client doesn't handle items correctly in NBT when chunks are sent without using the SubChunkRequest system.
In 4.6 this is observed with incorrect items shown in item frames; in 5.0 it's seen with items simply not showing up at all (difference due to modernization of the serialization format in 5.0).
