Update object.py #90

Open
JDJGInc wants to merge 1 commits from JDJGInc/patch-1 into 2.0
JDJGInc commented 2021-10-04 02:43:27 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Summary

Checklist

  • If code changes were made then they have been tested.
    • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes.
  • This PR fixes an issue.
  • This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters).
  • This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed)
  • This PR is not a code change (e.g. documentation, README, ...)
    this futhers:
    https://github.com/iDevision/enhanced-discord.py/pull/86
    I kind of broke the one before
<!-- Pull requests that do not fill this information in will likely be closed --> ## Summary <!-- What is this pull request for? Does it fix any issues? --> ## Checklist <!-- Put an x inside [ ] to check it, like so: [x] --> - [ ] If code changes were made then they have been tested. - [ ] I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes. - [ ] This PR fixes an issue. - [ ] This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters). - [ ] This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed) - [ ] This PR is **not** a code change (e.g. documentation, README, ...) this futhers: https://github.com/iDevision/enhanced-discord.py/pull/86 I kind of broke the one before
JDJGInc commented 2021-10-04 02:44:11 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

image
I generated the docs too.
I am not sure what I Can improve, but I think it looks pretty good to me.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/22802640/135785728-7b767fbc-0c2f-48f1-83f2-c1232c30ab17.png) I generated the docs too. I am not sure what I Can improve, but I think it looks pretty good to me.
JDJGInc commented 2021-10-22 17:22:00 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

to test this pull request, I would use an object converter then have it pass in the id you want to use, then test the attributes.

to test this pull request, I would use an object converter then have it pass in the id you want to use, then test the attributes.
JDJGInc commented 2021-10-22 17:24:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

once you have an object instance, you can try created_at (which works it's from danny's work)
worker_id is new, process_id, increment_id.
object.worker_id
object.process_id
object.increment_id.
then well
object.created_at
since you want to make sure It still works.(it should, I tested this too)

once you have an object instance, you can try created_at (which works it's from danny's work) worker_id is new, process_id, increment_id. object.worker_id object.process_id object.increment_id. then well object.created_at since you want to make sure It still works.(it should, I tested this too)
This pull request can be merged automatically.
You are not authorized to merge this pull request.

Checkout

From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.
git fetch -u origin JDJGInc/patch-1:JDJGInc/patch-1
git checkout JDJGInc/patch-1
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.