matthew/enhanced-discord.py
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 4 Pull Requests 21 Projects Releases Wiki Activity

About Specifications and Issues #36

New Issue
Closed
opened 2021-08-30 10:03:36 +00:00 by AomiVel · 4 comments
AomiVel commented 2021-08-30 10:03:36 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

about Specifications

Why is there a mix of specifications up to 1.7 and use of 2.0?

Example:

  • 1.7's avatar_url
  • 2.0's datetime type (aware/native)

about Issues

We can't make an issue unless we use a special method.

Can not:
1, Go to Issues tab
2, Click "New issue" button

Can:
Access the link to create an new issue.
(https://github.com/iDevision/enhanced-discord.py/issues/new)

# about Specifications Why is there a mix of specifications up to 1.7 and use of 2.0? Example: - 1.7's avatar_url - 2.0's datetime type (aware/native) # about Issues We can't make an issue unless we use a special method. Can not: 1, Go to Issues tab 2, Click "New issue" button Can: Access the link to create an new issue. (https://github.com/iDevision/enhanced-discord.py/issues/new)
paris-ci commented 2021-08-30 19:54:53 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Why is there a mix of specifications up to 1.7 and use of 2.0?

They are branches. 2.0 is the only maintained branch.

We can't make an issue unless we use a special method.

That's a github/browser bug. I am able to create issues just fine.

> Why is there a mix of specifications up to 1.7 and use of 2.0? They are branches. 2.0 is the only maintained branch. > We can't make an issue unless we use a special method. That's a github/browser bug. I am able to create issues just fine.
AomiVel commented 2021-08-30 23:49:40 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

They are branches. 2.0 is the only maintained branch.

The 1.7 and 2.0 mentioned here are from Discord.py. My apologies.

What I want to ask is why there is a mix of User.avatar_url, which is the spec up to 1.7 of discord.py, and datatime type aware, which is the spec from 2.0 of discord.py.
If this is the case, people who want to migrate from discord.py may have to rewrite the code.
What do you think about this?

That's a github/browser bug. I am able to create issues just fine.

I think it's not github's bug.

I think you can recreate it this way:

  1. open issue tab. (this repository)
  2. Click "New issue" button.
  3. You will see two options, "Ask a question" and "Discord Server".

Selecting "Ask a question" will take you to the Discussions tab of the original Discord.py.
Selecting "Discord Server" will take you to the original Discord.py's official server invite link.

I don't know if this is correct because I don't know much about Github, but I think it has something to do with the files in this folder(https://github.com/iDevision/enhanced-discord.py/tree/master/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE).

(I'm not a native speaker, so I use the DeepL translator. Sorry.)

> They are branches. 2.0 is the only maintained branch. The 1.7 and 2.0 mentioned here are from Discord.py. My apologies. What I want to ask is why there is a mix of User.avatar_url, which is the spec up to 1.7 of discord.py, and datatime type aware, which is the spec from 2.0 of discord.py. If this is the case, people who want to migrate from discord.py may have to rewrite the code. What do you think about this? > That's a github/browser bug. I am able to create issues just fine. I think it's not github's bug. I think you can recreate it this way: 1. open issue tab. (this repository) 2. Click "New issue" button. 3. You will see two options, "Ask a question" and "Discord Server". Selecting "Ask a question" will take you to the Discussions tab of the original Discord.py. Selecting "Discord Server" will take you to the original Discord.py's official server invite link. I don't know if this is correct because I don't know much about Github, but I think it has something to do with the files in this folder(https://github.com/iDevision/enhanced-discord.py/tree/master/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE). (I'm not a native speaker, so I use the DeepL translator. Sorry.)
paris-ci commented 2021-08-31 10:23:32 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

The 1.7 and 2.0 mentioned here are from Discord.py. My apologies.

What I want to ask is why there is a mix of User.avatar_url, which is the spec up to 1.7 of discord.py, and datatime type aware, which is the spec from 2.0 of discord.py.
If this is the case, people who want to migrate from discord.py may have to rewrite the code.
What do you think about this?

Where exactly do you see the mix ? In the online docs ? Because the 2.0 branch is a direct upgrade from dpy2.0a with a few added features.

I think it's not github's bug.

Oh yeah, I saw what you meant, I'll fix it

> The 1.7 and 2.0 mentioned here are from Discord.py. My apologies. > > What I want to ask is why there is a mix of User.avatar_url, which is the spec up to 1.7 of discord.py, and datatime type aware, which is the spec from 2.0 of discord.py. > If this is the case, people who want to migrate from discord.py may have to rewrite the code. What do you think about this? Where exactly do you see the mix ? In the online docs ? Because the 2.0 branch is a direct upgrade from dpy2.0a with a few added features. > I think it's not github's bug. Oh yeah, I saw what you meant, I'll fix it
AomiVel commented 2021-08-31 11:32:22 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link

Oh yeah, I saw what you meant, I'll fix it

Thank you.

Where exactly do you see the mix ?

I'm sorry, I forgot to tell you. It's in the program.

You will be able to reproduce this way:

import discord # enhanced-discord.py
import datetime
import traceback

client = discord.Client()

@client.event
async def on_ready():
    message = await client.get_channel(<channel_id>).fetch_message(<message_id>)
    
    try:
        message.created_at < datetime.datetime.utcnow()
    except Exception as e:
        """ If the datetime offset is different, an error will be print """
        # Error: TypeError: can't compare offset-naive and offset-aware datetimes
        traceback.print_exc(e)

    message.author.avatar_url
    message.author.avatar.url # Error

client.run(<TOKEN>)

In 2.0, the datetime offset returned by created_at, etc. is now aware. However, the offset returned by datetime.utcnow is naive. These comparisons will raise a TypeError.

In 1.7, if you want to get the avatar url of a user, use User.avatar_url. However, in 2.0, User.avatar.url is used.

Is there a reason for these?

> Oh yeah, I saw what you meant, I'll fix it Thank you. > Where exactly do you see the mix ? I'm sorry, I forgot to tell you. It's in the program. You will be able to reproduce this way: ```py import discord # enhanced-discord.py import datetime import traceback client = discord.Client() @client.event async def on_ready(): message = await client.get_channel(<channel_id>).fetch_message(<message_id>) try: message.created_at < datetime.datetime.utcnow() except Exception as e: """ If the datetime offset is different, an error will be print """ # Error: TypeError: can't compare offset-naive and offset-aware datetimes traceback.print_exc(e) message.author.avatar_url message.author.avatar.url # Error client.run(<TOKEN>) ``` In 2.0, the datetime offset returned by `created_at`, etc. is now `aware`. However, the offset returned by `datetime.utcnow` is `naive`. These comparisons will raise a TypeError. In 1.7, if you want to get the avatar url of a user, use `User.avatar_url`. However, in 2.0, `User.avatar.url` is used. Is there a reason for these?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
Something isn't working
documentation
Improvements or additions to documentation
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
enhancement
New feature or request
good first issue
Good for newcomers
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
invalid
This doesn't seem right
question
Further information is requested
wontfix
This will not be worked on
No Label
invalid
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
matthew
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: matthew/enhanced-discord.py#36
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?